About our international law blog

  • This site tracks developments in international family law from Richard Crouch and John Crouch of Crouch & Crouch in Arlington, Virginia. Our international practice has grown naturally from our location in our native Arlington, where our clients include many military, diplomatic and immigrant families, international organization employees, IT professionals, etc. This blog's purpose is to comment on the ongoing development of the law, and help other lawyers, journalists and the public understand individual cases. These postings do not provide a comprehensive description of the law. In fact, they will surely contain statements that were true at the time but have become less valid as the law continues to develop.

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Blog powered by TypePad

March 21, 2007

HAGUE CONVENTION AND CUSTODY MODIFICATION LITIGATION - HABITUAL RESIDENCE - “GRAVE RISK” DEFENSE - ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS REQUIRED.

A California Court of Appeal made some important points about the boudaries between custody cases adn hague convention cases, and construed the "Grave Risk of Harm" defense narrowly, in Forrest-Benavides v. Eaddy, ___ P.3d ___, ___ Cal. App. ___, 33 FLR 1039 (11/17/06), as it reversed a modifying decision by the California court that had made the original custody order.

Continue reading "HAGUE CONVENTION AND CUSTODY MODIFICATION LITIGATION - HABITUAL RESIDENCE - “GRAVE RISK” DEFENSE - ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS REQUIRED. " »