« Australian survey of divorce rates differing by education, age, smoking, children, but not alcohol | Main | Why Righties and Lefties? Scientists Have Hands Full. - washingtonpost.com »

March 10, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b15b69e2011168d0f0b1970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference LATEST U.S. DIVORCE RATE: Now lowest since 1970: 0.7% or 3.5 divorces per 1,000 people:

Comments

Daniel Rand

Hi,

The proper way to find the rate is divide the number of divorces (3.5) by the number of marriages, (7.6). The result is 0.46, or 46%. Not 0.7%.

John Crouch

No, the statisticians all say that dividing the number of divorces occurring by the number of marriages occurring in the same year is NOT a proper way to get any useful figure. Although in the very long run, if rates remained stable, I should think it would be accurate. These "per capita" rates that the government reports every year don't tell you much that intuitively is meaningful; but they are the standard way of reporting the divorce rates and so are useful for comparing different times and places. Now, a per capita rate that divided by the TOTAL MARRIED POPULATION would be useful, but for some reason no one calculates and reports that rate very often.

bob

Divorce should be illegal . jail time. make a wise decision to get married. not a stupid one.

twitter.com/2001amiracle

TAKE CHANCES,MAKE MISTAKES AND THAN SOME KIND OF WAY GET OUT OF IT IF YOU CAN IF YOU HAVE TOO.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment