EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION: Taylor v. Taylor

A husband successfully appealed a number of errors in an E.D. case, none of which appear to make significant law, in Taylor v. Taylor, 19 Va. App. 761, 454 SE2d 744, 9 VLW 1076 (2/28/95). The trial court approved a concededly wrong figure by the commissioner for the balance on a mortgage,  used a business valuation figure not supported by any of the evidence, charged the husband twice for certain property and then on remand did it again,  charged him 54 vice 25 months' rental value, and may have charged him with maintenance costs by mistake.