A wife's novel theory that source-of-funds credit can be awarded in property that is already gone and spent, and that therefore awarding her 100% of the remaining marital property was not enough, is rejected by the Court of Appeals. In the unpublished opinion in Bauckman v. Bauckman, 11 VLW 536 (10/29/96), the Court of Appeals explains that property which is no longer part of the marital estate cannot be awarded, so no matter how much separate property the wife proved she brought into the marital estate, she can't get more than is left now. The parties had lost their marital home and business in bankruptcy, so the marital estate was indeed less than it had once been.