In what would seem on the surface to be a fairly common-sense case, the Court of Appeals reversed a trial judge who (A) ordered the husband to pay the mortgage on a house husband owned while wife and child were occupying it and credited those payments against the child support he had ordered, but then (B) failed to change this order after the house was damaged by fire and could no longer be occupied. What exactly the judge did in Stewart-Payne v. Payne, 22 VLW 1061 (unpublished, 1/28/08), was to order the husband to keep paying the mortgage on the uninhabitable home and receive a credit toward his child support for doing so – thus not paying in cash the full amount of child support to the wife. (This arrangement was part of a pendente lite consent order.)