In Bandas v. Bandas, 430 S.E.2d 706 (1993), the Court of Appeals upheld an award of frivolous-filing sanctions against a husband for not knowing the new rule that it adopted in the instant appeal. The Court of Appeals admitted that this was a case of first impression, in which it had to look to the rulings of other states, but the appellant got it wrong, so he must be penalized. The new rule was that when an arbitration award is challenged in a domestic relations case the standard of review is neither "substantive fairness and equity" (what the husband argued), nor "gross miscarriage of justice" (which the trial judge thought) but "against public policy or unconscionable or other grounds to set aside a contract in equity."